Portfolio Categories TDI Theory
-1
archive,paged,tax-portfolio_category,term-theory,term-80,paged-3,qode-social-login-1.1.3,qode-restaurant-1.1.1,stockholm-core-2.2.4,select-child-theme-ver-1.1,select-theme-ver-8.3,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode_menu_,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.6.0,vc_responsive,elementor-default,elementor-kit-22512
Title Image

Archive

graphic of introduction from enhancing communication collaboration introduction

Introduction

Crowley, S., Eigenbrode, S. D., O’Rourke, M., Wulfhorst, J. D. (2013). Introduction. In M. O’Rourke, S. Crowley, S. D. Eigenbrode, and J. D., Wulfhorst (eds.) Enhancing Communication and Collaboration in Interdisciplinary Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.  

Image of Book Cover: Disciplining Interdisciplinarity

Philosophy as a theoretical foundation for I2S

  O’Rourke, M. (2013). Philosophy as a theoretical foundation for I2S. In G. Bammer, Disciplining Interdisciplinarity: Integration and Implementation Sciences for Researching Complex Real-World Problems, Canberra: ANU E Press.  

Thumbnail image of NEH Panel: A model for philosophers

NEH panel: A model for philosophers

Cross-disciplinary research (CDR) is an increasingly important part of the contemporary research ‘landscape’. Despite its growing importance there remain a large number of barriers to successful CDR and many of these barriers are poorly understood. In particular there are challenges at the conceptual and communicative

Thumbnail image of article Localization in cross-disciplinary research

Localization in Cross-Disciplinary Research: A Philosophical Approach,

Localization aims to adapt a product so that it feels “natural” to end-users in a target locale. This suggests that without localization, the product will feel foreign due to differences in knowledge — epistemic differences — between the source and target locales. These differences arise